Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 607
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 390(4): 338-345, 2024 Jan 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265645

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitals can leverage their position between the ultimate buyers and sellers of drugs to retain a substantial share of insurer pharmaceutical expenditures. METHODS: In this study, we used 2020-2021 national Blue Cross Blue Shield claims data regarding patients in the United States who had drug-infusion visits for oncologic conditions, inflammatory conditions, or blood-cell deficiency disorders. Markups of the reimbursement prices were measured in terms of amounts paid by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans to hospitals and physician practices relative to the amounts paid by these providers to drug manufacturers. Acquisition-price reductions in hospital payments to drug manufacturers were measured in terms of discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program. We estimated the percentage of Blue Cross Blue Shield drug spending that was received by drug manufacturers and the percentage retained by provider organizations. RESULTS: The study included 404,443 patients in the United States who had 4,727,189 drug-infusion visits. The median price markup (defined as the ratio of the reimbursement price to the acquisition price) for hospitals eligible for 340B discounts was 3.08 (interquartile range, 1.87 to 6.38). After adjustment for drug, patient, and geographic factors, price markups at hospitals eligible for 340B discounts were 6.59 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.02 to 7.16) as high as those in independent physician practices, and price markups at noneligible hospitals were 4.34 times (95% CI, 3.77 to 4.90) as high as those in physician practices. Hospitals eligible for 340B discounts retained 64.3% of insurer drug expenditures, whereas hospitals not eligible for 340B discounts retained 44.8% and independent physician practices retained 19.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that hospitals imposed large price markups and retained a substantial share of total insurer spending on physician-administered drugs for patients with private insurance. The effects were especially large for hospitals eligible for discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program on acquisition costs paid to manufacturers. (Funded by Arnold Ventures and the National Institute for Health Care Management.).


Assuntos
Planos de Seguro Blue Cross Blue Shield , Honorários Farmacêuticos , Preços Hospitalares , Seguro Saúde , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Humanos , Planos de Seguro Blue Cross Blue Shield/economia , Planos de Seguro Blue Cross Blue Shield/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais , Seguradoras , Médicos/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Setor Privado , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infusões Parenterais/economia , Infusões Parenterais/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/economia , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
JAMA ; 329(21): 1840-1847, 2023 06 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278813

RESUMO

Importance: US hospitals report data on many health care quality metrics to government and independent health care rating organizations, but the annual cost to acute care hospitals of measuring and reporting quality metric data, independent of resources spent on quality interventions, is not well known. Objective: To evaluate externally reported inpatient quality metrics for adult patients and estimate the cost of data collection and reporting, independent of quality-improvement efforts. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective time-driven activity-based costing study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland) with hospital personnel involved in quality metric reporting processes interviewed between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, about quality reporting activities in the 2018 calendar year. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included the number of metrics, annual person-hours per metric type, and annual personnel cost per metric type. Results: A total of 162 unique metrics were identified, of which 96 (59.3%) were claims-based, 107 (66.0%) were outcome metrics, and 101 (62.3%) were related to patient safety. Preparing and reporting data for these metrics required an estimated 108 478 person-hours, with an estimated personnel cost of $5 038 218.28 (2022 USD) plus an additional $602 730.66 in vendor fees. Claims-based (96 metrics; $37 553.58 per metric per year) and chart-abstracted (26 metrics; $33 871.30 per metric per year) metrics used the most resources per metric, while electronic metrics consumed far less (4 metrics; $1901.58 per metric per year). Conclusions and Relevance: Significant resources are expended exclusively for quality reporting, and some methods of quality assessment are far more expensive than others. Claims-based metrics were unexpectedly found to be the most resource intensive of all metric types. Policy makers should consider reducing the number of metrics and shifting to electronic metrics, when possible, to optimize resources spent in the overall pursuit of higher quality.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Registros Públicos de Dados de Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/provisão & distribuição , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/normas , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/economia , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(8): e2119764, 2021 08 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34342648

RESUMO

Importance: With rising expenditures on cancer care outpacing other sectors of the US health system, national attention has focused on insurer spending, particularly for patients with private insurance, for whom price transparency has historically been lacking. The type of hospital at which cancer care is delivered may be an important factor associated with insurer spending for patients with private insurance. Objective: To examine differences in spending and utilization for patients with private insurance undergoing common cancer surgery at National Cancer Institute (NCI) centers vs community hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult patients with an incident diagnosis of breast, colon, or lung cancer who underwent cancer-directed surgery from 2011 to 2014. Mean risk-adjusted spending and utilization outcomes were examined for each hospital type using multilevel generalized linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for patient, hospital, and region characteristics. Data were collected from the Health Care Cost Institute's national multipayer commercial claims data set, which encompasses claims paid by 3 of the 5 largest commercial health insurers in the United States (ie, Aetna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare). Data analyses were conducted from February 2018 to February 2019. Exposures: Hospital type at which cancer surgery was performed: NCI, non-NCI academic, or community. Main Outcomes and Measures: Spending outcomes were surgery-specific insurer prices paid and 90-day postdischarge payments. Utilization outcomes were length of stay (LOS), emergency department (ED) use, and hospital readmission within 90 days of discharge. Results: The study included 66 878 patients (51 569 [77.1%] women; 31 585 [47.2%] aged ≥65 years) with incident breast (35 788 [53.5%]), colon (21 378 [32.0%]), or lung (9712 [14.5%]) cancer undergoing cancer surgery at 2995 hospitals (5522 [8.3%] at NCI centers; 10 917 [16.3%] at non-NCI academic hospitals; 50 439 [75.4%] at community hospitals). Treatment at NCI centers was associated with higher surgery-specific insurer prices paid compared with community hospitals ($18 526 [95% CI, $16 650-$20 403] vs $14 772 [95% CI, $14 339-$15 204]; difference, $3755 [95% CI, $1661-$5849]; P < .001) and 90-day postdischarge payments ($47 035 [95% CI, $43 289-$50 781] vs $41 291 [95% CI, $40 350-$42 231]; difference, $5744 [95% CI, $1659-9829]; P = .006). There were no significant differences in LOS, ED use, or hospital readmission within 90 days of discharge. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, surgery at NCI centers vs community hospitals was associated with higher insurer spending for a surgical episode without differences in care utilization among patients with private insurance undergoing cancer surgery. A better understanding of the factors associated with prices and spending at NCI cancer centers is needed.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Med Care ; 59(3): 213-219, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33427797

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In anticipation of a demand surge for hospital beds attributed to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) many US states have mandated that hospitals postpone elective admissions. OBJECTIVES: To estimate excess demand for hospital beds due to COVID-19, the net financial impact of eliminating elective admissions in order to meet demand, and to explore the scenario when demand remains below capacity. RESEARCH DESIGN: An economic simulation to estimate the net financial impact of halting elective admissions, combining epidemiological reports, the US Census, American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the National Inpatient Sample. Deterministic sensitivity analyses explored the results while varying assumptions for demand and capacity. SUBJECTS: Inputs regarding disease prevalence and inpatient utilization were representative of the US population. Our base case relied on a hospital admission rate reported by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of 137.6 per 100,000, with the highest rates in people aged 65 years and older (378.8 per 100,000) and 50-64 years (207.4 per 100,000). On average, elective admissions accounted for 20% of total hospital admissions, and the average rate of unoccupied beds across hospitals was 30%. MEASURES: Net financial impact of halting elective admissions. RESULTS: On average, hospitals COVID-19 demand for hospital bed-days fell well short of hospital capacity, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The net financial impact of a 90-day COVID surge on a hospital was only favorable under a narrow circumstance when capacity was filled by a high proportion of COVID-19 cases among hospitals with low rates of elective admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that restricted elective care took on a substantial financial risk, potentially threatening viability. A sustainable public policy should therefore consider support to hospitals that responsibly served their communities through the crisis.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Health Serv Res ; 56(3): 464-473, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33393668

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP) is a pay for performance system that impacts traditional Medicare fee-for-service payments to hospitals through rewards and penalties. OBJECTIVES: To explore variation in overall and individual-hospital total performance score (TPS) and embedded domains for hospitals during 2014-2018. DATA SOURCE: Hospital data were retrieved from the publicly available HOSArchive dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Distribution of annual TPS and HVBP domain scores for 2014-2018 was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Transitional probabilities were analyzed to evaluate annual movement in the TPS ranking for outlier hospitals in the Top and Bottom 5%. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: TPS scores are positively skewed while the distribution of domain scores vary with patient experience, (clinical) outcome, and efficiency domains having a large number of (positive) outliers. Mean TPS score decreased from 40.54 in 2014 to 38.04 by 2018. Improvement was shown in mean domain scores for clinical process of care and clinical outcome using 95% confidence intervals, with hospitals gaining 10 points over the study period in clinical outcome. Changes in the mean scores for other domains did not show consistent increases or decreases. Chi-square analyses of hospital ranking categories showed some evidence that, as a group, hospitals initially ranked in the Bottom 5% are making consistent annual movements to higher categories. In contrast, over half of the hospitals ranking in the initial Top 5% remained in the top category across all study years. CONCLUSIONS: It may be time for CMS to redesign the HVBP incentive program to assure the measures accurately demonstrate sustained improvement, the domain weights appropriately reflect the level of importance, and the TPS comparative ranking methodology does not discourage lower-performing hospitals from actively improving the care they deliver and achieving top ranks.


Assuntos
Aquisição Baseada em Valor/organização & administração , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/estatística & dados numéricos , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/normas
8.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(1): 174-182, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168158

RESUMO

New technologies in medicine, even if they are promising medically, are often expensive and logistically difficult to implement at the hospital level. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a model technology that is revolutionary in treating aortic stenosis, but has been plagued with significant challenges with financial sustainability. In this article, a margin analysis at the hospital level was performed using literature data. A TAVR industry analysis was performed using Porter's Five Forces framework. The data indicate that TAVR is more expensive than surgical aortic valve replacement, although the cost of TAVR is declining with the use of an optimized minimalist protocol. The overall industry is growing as its clinical indications expand, and it will likely undergo significant reduction of costs when new valves enter the US market. As such, TAVR is a growing industry, with financial sustainability currently dependent on operational efficiency. A concluding list of specific program interventions is provided to help TAVR programs improve operational efficiency and clinical outcomes, as well as help decide whether to create, expand, or redirect funding for TAVR programs. Importantly, the frameworks used to analyze this rapidly evolving technology can be applied to other new technologies to determine financial sustainability.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/economia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/economia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
9.
Ann Ig ; 33(1): 103-104, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354700

RESUMO

The new Coronavirus is spreading rapidly around the world these days, and many countries are heavily infected with it. Corona is a large family of viruses that cause respiratory infections, from the common cold to the SARS epidemic that broke out in 2003, and now the newest member of the family (SARS-Cov-2) is present in Iran. Like other countries, it is expanding rapidly. Currently, COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most important health issues in Iran and around the World (1-4). The "Corona crisis" has led to various effects in the World, including economic, political, educational, cultural, lifestyle, and so on. But over time, the Corona outbreak appears to have led to an economic shock in the World. According to economists, there are three types of economic shocks caused by the virus; type L economic shock, in which economic growth slows and never improves; type U economic shock, in which economic growth decreases and subsequently improves, but never returns to its previous state; and type V economic shock, in which economic growth gradually decreases, but gradually returns to normal (5-8). It seems, in Iran, due to COVID-19 crisis, the hospitals as a heart of health services providing system were faced with the L type of economic shock.


Assuntos
COVID-19/economia , Economia Hospitalar , Pandemias/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Recessão Econômica , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia
10.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 30(1): 113-119, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32807371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite rapid increases in the demand for total shoulder arthroplasty, data describing cost trends are scarce. We aim to (1) describe variation in the cost of shoulder arthroplasty performed by different surgeons at multiple hospitals and (2) determine the driving factors of such variation. METHODS: A standardized, highly accurate cost accounting method, time-driven activity-based costing, was used to determine the cost of 1571 shoulder arthroplasties performed by 12 surgeons at 4 high-volume institutions between 2016 and 2018. Costs were broken down into supply costs (including implant price and consumables) and personnel costs, including physician fees. Cost parameters were compared with total cost for surgical episodes and case volume. RESULTS: Across 4 institutions and 12 surgeons, surgeon volume and hospital volume did not correlate with episode-of-care cost. Average cost per case of each institution varied by factors of 1.6 (P = .47) and 1.7 (P = .06) for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), respectively. Implant (56% and 62%, respectively) and personnel costs from check-in through the operating room (21% and 17%, respectively) represented the highest percentages of cost and highly correlated with the cost of the episode of care for TSA and RSA. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in episode-of-care total costs for both TSA and RSA had no association with hospital or surgeon case volume at 4 high-volume institutions but was driven primarily by variation in implant and personnel costs through the operating room. This analysis does not address medium- or long-term costs.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Ombro , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/economia , Articulação do Ombro , Artroplastia do Ombro/economia , Artroplastia do Ombro/instrumentação , Artroplastia do Ombro/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Periódico , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Prótese de Ombro/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Med Care ; 58(10): 895-902, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833936

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies of medical conditions in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative did not show reductions in Medicare payments for the majority of conditions, but this could mask heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether earlier enrollment and/or longer participation in BPCI were associated with performance. DESIGN: We divided BPCI hospitals into wave 1 (joined 10/1/13, 1/1/14, or 4/1/14), wave 2 (joined 7/1/14, 10/1/14, 1/1/15, or 4/1/15), and wave 3 (joined 7/1/15, 10/1/15, or 1/1/16) and compared changes in Medicare payments for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between BPCI and matched controls in 6-month increments. SUBJECTS: US hospitals. MEASURES: Medicare payments. RESULTS: There were 120 hospital-condition pairs in wave 1, 264 in wave 2, and 300 in wave 3. Wave 1 hospitals had similar savings to controls early in the program (0-6 mo difference in differences -$10, P=0.976; 6-12 mo +$295, P=0.441; 12-18 mo -$540, P=0.218; 18-24 mo -$485, P=0.259) but had greater savings than controls at 24-30 months (difference in differences -$663, P=0.035). Wave 2 (0-6 mo +$193, P=0.524; 6-12 mo -$183, P=0.489; 12-18 mo -$162, P=0.618) and wave 3 hospitals (0-6 mo +$79, P=0.753; 6-12 mo -$32, P=0.876) did not achieve significant savings at any time interval. There were no differential changes in patient outcomes over time. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that joined BPCI earliest began to achieve savings at roughly 2 years of participation. These findings have implications for this and other alternative payment models.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
12.
Nutrients ; 12(9)2020 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32825528

RESUMO

The safety of parenteral nutrition (PN) remains a concern in preterm neonates, impacting clinical outcomes and health-care-resource use and costs. This cost-consequence analysis assessed national-level impacts of a 10-percentage point increase in use of industry-prepared three-chamber bags (3CBs) on clinical outcomes, healthcare resources, and hospital budgets across seven European countries. A ten-percentage-point 3CB use-increase model was developed for Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the UK. The cost-consequence analysis estimated the impact on compounding error harm and bloodstream infection (BSI) rates, staff time, and annual hospital budget. Of 265,000 (52%) preterm neonates, 133,000 (52%) were estimated to require PN. Baseline compounding methods were estimated as 43% pharmacy manual, 16% pharmacy automated, 22% ward, 9% outsourced, 3% industry provided non-3CBs, and 7% 3CBs. A modeled increased 3CB use would change these values to 39%, 15%, 18%, 9%, 3%, and 17%, respectively. Modeled consequences included -11.6% for harm due to compounding errors and -2.7% for BSIs. Labor time saved would equate to 41 specialized nurses, 29 senior pharmacists, 26 pharmacy assistants, and 22 senior pediatricians working full time. Budget impact would be a €8,960,601 (3.4%) fall from €260,329,814 to €251,369,212. Even a small increase in the use of 3CBs in preterm neonates could substantially improve neonatal clinical outcomes, and provide notable resource and cost savings to hospitals.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/economia , Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Nutrição Parenteral/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Orçamentos , Redução de Custos , Composição de Medicamentos/economia , Composição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nutrição Parenteral/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança
13.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(1): 134-154, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32652215

RESUMO

Nosocomial or healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are associated with a financial burden that affects both patients and healthcare institutions worldwide. The clinical best care practices (CBPs) of hand hygiene, hygiene and sanitation, screening, and basic and additional precautions aim to reduce this burden. The COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed these four CBPs are critically important prevention practices that limit the spread of HCAIs. This paper conducted a systematic review of economic evaluations related to these four CBPs using a discounting approach. We searched for articles published between 2000 and 2019. We included economic evaluations of infection prevention and control of Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhoea, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Results were analysed with cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit and cost-consequence analyses. Articles were assessed for quality. A total of 11,898 articles were screened and seven were included. Most studies (4/7) were of overall moderate quality. All studies demonstrated cost effectiveness of CBPs. The average yearly net cost savings from the CBPs ranged from $252,847 (2019 Canadian dollars) to $1,691,823, depending on the rate of discount (3% and 8%). The average incremental benefit cost ratio of CBPs varied from 2.48 to 7.66. In order to make efficient use of resources and maximize health benefits, ongoing research in the economic evaluation of infection control should be carried out to support evidence-based healthcare policy decisions.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/economia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/economia , Pandemias/economia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/economia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Canadá , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2
14.
BMJ Open ; 10(6): e035512, 2020 06 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32606058

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the latent structure of health financing and the institutional distribution of health expenditure (focused on hospital expenditure) in provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities of mainland China, and to examine how these profiles may be related to their externalising and internalising characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: The study used panel data harvested from the China National Health Accounts Report 2018. METHODS: Mainland China's provincial data on health expenditure in 2017 was studied. A latent profile analysis was conducted to identify health financing and hospital health expenditure profiles in China. Additionally, rank-sum tests were used to understand the difference of socioeconomic indicators between subgroups. RESULTS: A best-fitting three-profile solution for per capita health financing was identified, with government health expenditure (χ2=10.137, p=0.006) and social health expenditure (χ2=6.899, p=0.032) varying significantly by profiles. Health expenditure in hospitals was subject to a two-profile solution with health expenditure flow to urban hospitals, county hospitals and community health service centres having significant differences between the two profiles (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Per capita health financing and health expenditure spent in hospitals have discrepant socioeconomic characteristics in different profiles, which may be attributed to macroeconomic factors and government policies. The study provided new and explicit ideas for health financing and health policy regulation in China.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , China , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Financiamento Governamental , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 577, 2020 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32580775

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To investigate the construction situation, costs and charges associated with pharmacy intravenous admixture services (PIVAS) to provide references for the construction and development of PIVAS in mainland China. METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted via a WeChat Group targeting PIVAS leaders in hospitals to investigate the basic situation of PIVAS, including opening time, area, number of PIVAS, equipment, management mode, PIVAS costs and charges, as well as numbers of beds, open wards, and staff, and analyze differences in PIVAS construction at different provincial and hospital levels. RESULTS: 137 questionnaires were collected from 29 provinces, representing a response rate of 99.3%. Most participants (88.4%) were from Level III Hospitals. The number of years of operations of PIVAS ranged from 1 to 22 (median: 6). PIVAS site area ranged between 100 and 1973 m2; daily average infusion volume was concentrated in the ranges 0-1000 bags (29.9%, 41/137) and 1001-2000 bags (26.3%, 36/137). In terms of PIVAS management mode, the vast majority used separate pharmacy management (65.0%, 89/137). Only 52.6% (72/137) of PIVAS have standardized charges, and 70.1% (96/137) operate at a loss. The median costs of mixed tumor chemotherapy drugs, total parenteral nutrition, general medicine, antibiotics were 20, 35, 4 and 5 RMB, respectively. With the exception of a few features, PIVAS construction does not obviously differ among different regions and hospital levels. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, PIVAS in China has developed rapidly and become relatively large. The main problems are that most provinces lack standards for charges and PIVAS construction differs among hospitals. Therefore, standards for PIVAS construction and charges should be developed to provide a reference for the future development of PIVAS.


Assuntos
Composição de Medicamentos/economia , Arquitetura Hospitalar , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Administração Intravenosa , China , Estudos Transversais , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Custos Hospitalares
16.
World J Gastroenterol ; 26(21): 2682-2690, 2020 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32550746

RESUMO

Postoperative complications (PC) are a basic health outcome, but no surgery service in the world records and/or audits the PC associated with all the surgical procedures it performs. Most studies that have assessed the cost of PC suffer from poor quality and a lack of transparency and consistency. The payment system in place often rewards the volume of services provided rather than the quality of patients' clinical outcomes. Without a thorough registration of PC, the economic costs involved cannot be determined. An accurate, reliable appraisal would help identify areas for investment in order to reduce the incidence of PC, improve surgical results, and bring down the economic costs. This article describes how to quantify and classify PC using the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index, discusses the perspectives from which economic evaluations are performed and the minimum postoperative follow-up established, and makes various recommendations. The availability of accurate and impartially audited data on PC will help reduce their incidence and bring down costs. Patients, the health authorities, and society as a whole are sure to benefit.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo/métodos , Economia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo/normas , Documentação/economia , Documentação/normas , Documentação/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Hospitalar/normas , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
17.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(5): e205529, 2020 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32469411

RESUMO

Importance: Medicaid expansion was widely expected to alleviate the financial stresses faced by hospitals by providing additional revenue in the form of Medicaid reimbursements from patients previously receiving uncompensated care. Among nonprofit hospitals, which receive tax-exempt status in part because of their provision of uncompensated care, Medicaid expansion could have released hospital funds toward other community benefit activities. Objective: To examine changes in nonprofit hospital spending on community benefit activities after Medicaid expansion. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used difference-in-differences analysis of 1666 US nonprofit hospitals that filed Internal Revenue Service Form 990 Schedule H detailing their community benefit expenditures between 2011 and 2017. The analysis was conducted from February to September 2019. Exposures: State Medicaid expansion between 2011 and 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of hospital operating expenditures attributable to charity care and subsidized care, bad debt (ie, unreimbursed spending for care of patients who did not apply for charity care), unreimbursed Medicaid spending, noncare direct community spending, and total community benefit spending. Results: Of 1478 hospitals in the sample in 2011, nearly half (653 [44.2%]) were small hospitals with fewer than 100 beds, and nearly 70% of hospitals (1023 [69.2%]) were in urban areas. Among the 1666 nonprofit hospitals, Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in spending on charity care and subsidized care (-0.68 [95% CI, -0.99 to -0.37] percentage points from a baseline mean [SD] of 3.6% [4.0%] of total hospital expenditures; P < .001) and in bad debt (-0.17 [95% CI, -0.32 to -0.01] percentage points). There was an increase in unreimbursed spending attributable to caring for Medicaid patients (0.85 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.10] percentage points; P = .04), which canceled out uncompensated care savings from the expansion. Noncare direct community expenditures decreased overall (-0.24 [95% CI, -0.48 to 0.00] percentage points; P = .049). Direct community expenditures remained more stable in small hospitals (-0.07 [95% CI, -0.20 to 0.05] percentage points; P =.26) compared with large hospitals (-0.37 [95% CI, -0.86 to 0.12] percentage points; P = .14) and in nonurban hospitals (0.02 [95% CI, -0.09 to 0.14] percentage points; P = .70) compared with urban hospitals (-0.36 [95% CI, -0.73 to 0.01] percentage points; P = .06). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in nonprofit hospitals' burden of providing uncompensated care, but this financial relief was not redirected toward spending on other community benefits.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Medicaid/organização & administração , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organização & administração , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Governo Estadual , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados/economia , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
18.
N Z Med J ; 133(1514): 41-48, 2020 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379738

RESUMO

AIMS: The purpose of this study is to audit the numbers of non-residents requiring orthopaedic admission to Dunedin and Southland Hospitals and determine the effects of increasing tourist numbers on healthcare resources. METHOD: All non-resident orthopaedic admissions to Dunedin Hospital from January 2005 to December 2017 and Invercargill Hospital from January 2011 to December 2017 were analysed with respect to country of residence, mechanism of injury, primary diagnosis and case weights consumed. The results were combined with figures from 1997-2004 to give a 21-year series for Dunedin Hospital. RESULTS: There has been a significant increase in the number of admissions and case weights (CW) over the past 21 years at Dunedin Hospital (p<0.001). The most common mechanisms of injury were snow sports at Dunedin Hospital and falls for Southland Hospital. Between 2011 and 2017 there were on average 50 non-resident admissions per year (92.9 CW/year) to Dunedin Hospital and 74 admissions (120.7 CW/year) in Southland. CONCLUSION: Increasing tourist numbers have resulted in an increase number of orthopaedic admissions to Dunedin Hospital over the last two decades although it remains a small proportion of the total workload. Southland Hospital is relatively more affected. These patients represent an annual cost in excess of $1,000,000 to Southern DHB.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ásia/etnologia , Austrália/etnologia , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/epidemiologia , Auditoria Médica , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Ortopedia/organização & administração , Ortopedia/tendências , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido/etnologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
20.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 522, 2020 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32306932

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service volume and quality of care among Chinese pneumonia patients. METHODS: A secondary hospital that replaced Fee-For-Service (FFS) with GB in China in 2016 was sampled. We used daily expenditure to assess health expenditure; monthly admission, length of stay (LOS), number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics to evaluate service volume; record with multiple antibiotics and readmission to assess quality of care. Descriptive analyses were adopted to evaluate changes after the reform, logistic regression and multivariable linear regressions were used to analyze changes associated with the reform. RESULTS: In 2015 and 2016, 3400 admissions from 3173 inpatients and 2342 admissions from 2246 inpatients were admitted, respectively. According to regression analyses, daily expenditure, LOS, readmission, and records with multiple antibiotic usages significantly declined after the reform. However, no significant relation was observed between GB and the number of drugs per record or record containing antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with FFS, GB can curtail health expenditure and improve quality of care. As far as service volume was concerned, LOS and monthly admission declined, while number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics were not affected.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Atenção Secundária à Saúde/economia , Adulto , Orçamentos , China , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...